HanDa vs Speak for Learning Korean
Short answer: Speak is the better choice if you want a polished, well-produced lesson experience or expect to study more than one language. HanDa is the better choice if Korean is your only target and you want speech levels, TOPIK-mapped content and phoneme-level pronunciation feedback. We make HanDa, so weigh this accordingly — the comparison below sticks to structural differences you can verify yourself.
The core difference
Speak is a multi-language product. Korean is one of several tracks, and its curriculum architecture has to work for every language it supports. That is a genuine strength — it means a large, well-tested lesson system and a very polished app.
HanDa is Korean-only. Everything in it can assume Korean, which is why it can enforce 존댓말 and 반말 inside role-plays, map levels to TOPIK 1–6, and build drills around Korean conjugation specifically. That is also its limitation: if you decide to learn Japanese next year, HanDa is useless to you and Speak isn't.
Neither bet is wrong. They're just different bets.
Side by side
| HanDa | Speak | |
|---|---|---|
| Languages | Korean only | Multiple, including Korean |
| Correction approach | 4 AI teachers, each using a different correction method | Single consistent tutor approach |
| Speech levels (존댓말/반말) | Enforced per scenario | Not a core feature |
| Pronunciation feedback | Phoneme level, tracked over time | Sentence-level scoring |
| Level mapping | TOPIK 1–6 | Internal levels |
| Shared subscription | Host plan includes 2 friends | Single user |
| Platform | iOS and Android | iOS, Android, web |
| Approx. price | $10–21/month | Varies by tier and region |
Prices in this category change often and vary by country. Check both stores before deciding.
Where Speak is better
- Production quality. Speak's lessons are more polished than anything HanDa ships.
- Multi-language. One subscription, several languages.
- Web access. HanDa has no browser version; learning happens on your phone.
- Brand maturity. More reviews, longer track record, easier to trust sight-unseen.
Where HanDa is better
- Speech levels. Korean's formality system is not an accent — using 반말 with a stranger is a social error. HanDa assigns a speech level per scenario and holds you to it. Language-agnostic apps generally don't model this.
- Pronunciation granularity. HanDa scores at the phoneme level and tracks which specific sounds you keep missing, rather than returning one overall number per sentence.
- Mistake memory. Recurring errors are detected across sessions and become the next day's mission and a weekly email report.
- Teaching style choice. Four teachers apply genuinely different correction strategies — recast, metalinguistic explanation, casual, explicit. Learners who freeze under direct correction and learners who want to be told exactly what they got wrong need different things.
- Shared use. One Host subscriber can bring two friends into a room. Speak is single-player.
How to actually decide
Answer one question: is Korean the only language you plan to study for the next year?
If yes, the Korean-specific machinery is worth more than the polish, and HanDa is the better fit. If no — if there's any chance you'll switch or add a language — a multi-language subscription is better value and you should pick Speak or Langua.
Both offer a way to try before committing. Use it. Two weeks of real usage tells you more than any comparison page, including this one.
Related reading
Practice this with an AI tutor
HanDa corrects every sentence you write or say — in real conversation, not flashcards.